夫兵久而國利者未之有也
Sun Tzu
This statement suggests that prolonged warfare is not beneficial for a country because it can lead to significant losses in terms of lives, resources, and wealth. In addition, prolonged warfare can also weaken a country’s economy and military, making it more vulnerable to attacks from its enemies. Ultimately, Sun Tzu is advocating for the use of strategic and efficient military tactics in order to achieve victory in warfare, rather than engaging in prolonged and costly conflicts.
There is no instance of a business having benefited from prolonged conflict.
It is generally not good for businesses to have prolonged conflict. Conflict can lead to instability, which can make it difficult for businesses to operate and can discourage people from spending money. Prolonged conflict can deplete the resources a business has by requiring the business to devote time, money, and other resources to resolving the conflict, which can take away from the resources the business has available to invest in other areas. In the long term, prolonged conflict can lead to economic decline, which can harm businesses. Therefore, it is in the best interests of businesses to avoid prolonged conflict whenever possible.
There are many types of prolonged conflict that can arise in a business setting. These can include labor disputes, legal disputes, disputes between businesses, internal conflicts within a company, and disputes with customers or clients. Any situation that involves prolonged disagreement or disagreement between parties can be considered a type of prolonged conflict in a business setting. Prolonged conflict can lead to instability and can harm a business by discouraging people from spending money, damaging infrastructure, and even leading to economic decline. It is in the best interests of businesses to avoid prolonged conflict whenever possible.
An example of prolonged conflict in business could be a long-standing dispute between two companies over a contract or intellectual property. This conflict could involve legal battles, public fights over reputation and market share, and significant financial costs for both companies. Instead of continuing to engage in this prolonged conflict, it would be more beneficial for both companies to try to find a resolution through negotiation or mediation in order to avoid further damage to their businesses.